The Inspiration of the Scriptures Scientifically Demonstrated
Ivan Panin
Letter to the New York Sun For some months preceding Sunday, November 19, 1899
the New York
Sun had been devoting the better part of a page of its Sunday edition to the discussion
of the truth of Christianity. On that date it printed a letter from one W.R.L.,
in which he denounced Christianity, using the old oft-refuted "arguments,"
and challenged "some champion of orthodoxy to come into the arena
of the Sun," and give its readers some "facts" in
defence of the Christian religion. The writer had not seen the N.Y. Sun for
years; but on his way from South Framingham to Grafton, Massachusetts, a copy
of the Sun of that date, left on a vacant seat in the train, 'fell into his hands.'
The following letter met that challenge.
The letter was reprinted by the writer himself in a pamphlet of some
fifty pages with the Greek text of Matthew i, 1-17 and the vocabularies
thereto, enabling the scholarly reader to verify his statements for himself.
Sir: - In to-day's Sun Mr. W.R.L.
calls for a "champion of orthodoxy" to "step into the
arena of the Sun;' and give him some "facts." Here are
some facts:
The first 17 verses of the New
Testament contain the of the Christ. It
consists of two main parts: Verses 1-11 cover the period from Abraham, the
father of the chosen people, to the Captivity, when they ceased as an
independent people. Verses 12-17 cover the period from the Captivity to the
promised Deliverer, the Christ.
Let us examine the first
part of this genealogy.
Its vocabulary has 49 words, or 7 x
7. This number is itself seven (Feature 1) sevens (Feature 2), and the sum of
its factors is 2 sevens (Feature 3). Of these 49 words 28, or 4 sevens, begin
with a vowel; and 21, or 3 sevens, begin with a consonant (Feature 4).
Again: these 49 words of the
vocabulary have 266 letters, or 7 x 2 x 19; this number is itself 38 sevens
(Feature 5), and the sum of its factors is 28, or 4 sevens (Feature 6), while
the sum of its figures is 14, or 2 sevens (Feature 7). Of these 266 letters,
moreover, 140, or 20 sevens, are vowels, and 126, or 18 sevens, are consonants
(Feature 8).
That is to say: Just as the number
of words in the vocabulary is a multiple of seven, so is
the number of its letters a multiple of seven; just as the sum of the factors
of the number of the words is a multiple of seven, so is the sum of the factors
of the number of their letters a multiple of seven. And just as the number of
words is divided between vowel words and consonant words by sevens, so is their
number of letters divided between vowels and consonants by sevens.
Again: Of these 49 words 35, or 5
sevens, occur more than once in the passage; and 14, or 2 sevens, occur but
once (Feature 9); seven occur in more than one form, and 42, or 6 sevens, occur
in only one form (Feature 10). And among the parts of speech the 49 words are
thus divided: 42, or 6 sevens, are nouns, seven are
not nouns (Feature 12). Of the nouns 35 or 5 sevens, are Proper names, seven
are common nouns (Feature 12). Of the Proper names 28 are male ancestors of the
Christ, and seven are not (Feature 13).
Moreover, these 49 words are
distributed alphabetically thus: Words under A-E are 21 in number, or 3 sevens;
Z-K 14, or 2 sevens; M-X also 14. No other groups of sevens stopping at the end
of a letter are made by these 49 words, the groups of sevens stop with these
letters and no others. But the letters A, E, Z, K, M, X, are letters 1, 5, 6,
10, 12, 22, of the Greek alphabet, and the sum of these numbers (called their
Place Values) is 56, or 8 sevens (Feature 14).
This enumeration of the numeric
phenomena of these 11 verses does not begin to be exhaustive, but enough has
been shown to make it clear that this part of the genealogy is constructed on
an elaborate design of sevens.
Let us not turn to
the genealogy as a whole. I will not weary your readers with recounting all the
numeric phenomena thereof: pages alone would exhaust them. I will point out
only one feature: The New Testament is written in Greek. The Greeks had no
separate symbols for expressing numbers, corresponding to our Arabic figures,
but used instead the letters of their alphabet: just as the Hebrews, in whose
language the Old Testament is written, made use for the same purpose of theirs.
Accordingly, the 24 Greek letters stand for the following numbers: 1, 2, 3, 4,
5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700,
800. Every Greek word is thus a sum in arithmetic obtained by adding the
numbers for which its letters stand, or their numeric values. Now the
vocabulary to the entire genealogy has 72 words. If we write its numeric value
over each of these 72 words, and add them, we get for their sum 42,364, or
6,052 sevens, distributed into the following alphabetical groups only: A-B,
have 9.821, or 1,403 sevens: G-D, 1904, or 272 sevens; 3,703, or 529 sevens;
TH-R, 19,264, or 2,752 sevens; A-X 7,672, or 1,096 sevens. But the numeric
value of the 10 letters used for making these groups is 931, or 7 x 7 x 19, a
multiple not only of seven but of seven sevens.
Let Mr. W.R.L. try to write some 300
words intelligently like this genealogy, and
reproduce some numeric phenomena of like designs. If he does it in 6 months, he
will indeed do a wonder. Let us assume that Matthew accomplished this feat in
one month.
2. The
second part of this chapter, verses 18-25, relates the birth
of Christ. It consists of 161 words, or 23 sevens; occurring in 105 forms, or
15 sevens, with a vocabulary of 77 words or 11 sevens. Joseph is spoken to here
by the angel. Accordingly, of the 77 words the angel uses 28, or 4 sevens; of
the 105 forms he uses 35, or 5 sevens; the numeric value of the vocabulary is
52,605, or 7,515 sevens; of the forms, 65,429, or 9,347 sevens.
This enumeration only begins as it
were to barely scratch the surface of the numerics of this passage. But what is
specially noteworthy here is the fact that the angel's
speech has also a scheme of sevens making it a kind of ring within a ring, a
wheel within a wheel. If Mr. L. can write a similar passage of 161 words with
the same scheme of sevens alone (though there are several others here) in some
three years, he would accomplish a still greater wonder. Let us assume Matthew
accomplished this feat in only 6 months.
3. The second chapter of Matthew
tells of the childhood of the Christ. Its vocabulary has
161 words, or 23 sevens, with 896 letters, or 128 sevens, and 238 forms, or 34
sevens; the numeric value of the vocabulary is 123,529, or 17,647 sevens; of
the forms, 166,985, or 23,855 sevens; and so on through pages of enumeration.
This chapter has at least four logical divisions, and each division shows alone
the same phenomena found in the chapter as a whole. Thus the first six verses
have a vocabulary of 56 words, or 8 sevens, etc. There are some speeches here:
Herod speaks, the Magi speak, the angel speaks. But so
pronounced are the numeric phenomena here, that though there are as it were
numerous rings within rings, and wheels within wheels, each is perfect in
itself, though forming all the while only part of the rest.
If Mr. L. can write a chapter like
this as naturally as Matthew writes, but containing in some 500 words so many
intertwined yet harmonious numeric features, in say the rest of his days -
whatever his age now, or the one to which he is to attain: if he thus
accomplish it at all, it will indeed be marvel of marvels. Let us assume that
Matthew accomplished this feat in only 3 years.
4. There is not, however, a single
paragraph of the scores in Matthew that is not constructed in exactly the same
manner. Only with each additional paragraph the difficulty of constructing it
increases not in arithmetical but in geometrical
progression. For he contrives to write numeric relations to
what goes before and after. Thus in his last chapter he contrives to use
just 7 words not used by him before. It would thus be easy to show that Mr. L.
would require some centuries to write a book like Matthew's. How long it took
Matthew the writer does not know. But how he contrived to do it between the
Crucifixion, A.D.30 (and his Gospel could not have been written earlier), and
the destruction of Jerusalem, A.D.70 (and the Gospel could not have been written
later), let Mr. L. and his like-minded explain.
Anyhow Matthew did it, and we thus
have a miracle - an unheard-of literary, mathematical artist, unequaled, hardly
even conceivable. This is the first fact for Mr. L. to contemplate.
A second fact is yet more important:
In his very first section, the genealogy discussed above, the words found nowhere
else in the New Testament, occur 42 times, 7 x 6; and have 126 letters, 7 x 6 x
3, each number a multiple not only of seven, but of 6 sevens, to name only two
of the many numeric features of these words. But how did Matthew know,
when designing this scheme for these words (whose sole characteristic is that
they are found nowhere else in the New Testament) that they would not be found
in the other 26 books? that they would not be used by
the other 7 New Testament writers? Unless we assume the impossible hypothesis
that he had an agreement with them to that effect, he must have had the rest of
the New Testament before him when he wrote his book. The Gospel of Matthew,
then, was written last.
5. It so happens, however, that the
Gospel of Mark shows the very same phenomena. Thus the very
passage called so triumphantly in today's Sun a "forgery," the Last
Twelve Verses of Mark, presents among some sixty features of sevens the
following phenomena: It has 175 words, or 95 sevens; a vocabulary of 98 words,
or 2 sevens of sevens with 553 letters, or 79 sevens; 133 forms, or 19 sevens,
and so on to the minutest detail.
Mark, then, is another miracle,
another unparalleled literary genius. And in the same way in which it was shown
that Matthew wrote last it is also shown that Mark, too, wrote last. Thus to
take an example from this very passage: It has just one word found nowhere else
in the New Testament, 'deadly'. This fact is signaled by no less than seven
features of sevens thus: Its numeric value is 581, or 83 sevens, with the sum
of its figures 14, or 2 sevens, of which the letters 3, 5, 7, from both the
BEGINNING and END of the word have 490, or 7 x 7 x 5 x 2: a multiple of seven
sevens, with the sum of its factors 21, or 3 sevens. In the vocabulary it is
preceded by 42 words, 7 x 6; in the passage itself by
126 words, or 7 x 6 x 3, both numbers multiples not only of seven, but of 6
sevens. We have thus established before us this third fact for Mr. L. to
contemplate: Matthew surely wrote after Mark, and Mark just
as surely wrote after Matthew.
6. It happens, however, to be a
fourth fact, that Luke presents the same phenomena as
Matthew and Mark; and so does John, and James, and Peter, and Jude, and Paul.
And we have thus no longer two great unheard-of mathematical literati, but
eight of them and each wrote after the other.
7. And not only
this: As Luke and Peter wrote each 2 books, John 5, and Paul 14, it can
in the same way be shown that each of the 27 New Testament books was written last. In fact, not a page of the over 500 in Westcott and Hort's
Greek edition (which the writer has used throughout) but it can be demonstrated
thus to have been written last.
The phenomena are there and there is
no human way of explaining them. Eight men cannot each write last, 97 books,
some 500 pages cannot each be written first. But once assume that one Mind
directed the whole, and the problem is solved simply enough; but this is Verbal
Inspiration - of every jot and tittle of the New Testament.
There remains only to be added that
by precisely the same kind of evidence the Hebrew Old Testament is proved to be
equally inspired. Thus the very first verse of Genesis has seven words, 28
letters, or 4 sevens: to name only two out of the dozens of numeric features of
this one verse of only seven words. - N.Y. Sun, Nov. 21, 1899 - Corrected.
To this letter several replies appeared in the Sun, but not a single
-
(a) By showing that
the facts are not as here given.
(b) By showing that it is possible for 8 men to write each after the other 7; for 27 hooks,
for some 500 pages to be each in its turn written last.(c) By showing that even if the facts be true, the arithmetic faultless, and the collocation of the numerics honest, it does not follow that mere men could not have
written this without Inspiration from above.Abbot and Charles W. Eliot are still living) [now in 1927 also gone to where
they may know] were respectfully but publicly invited to refute the writer. One
was not "interested" in the writer's "arithmetical"
doings; two "regretted" that they "had no time" to
give heed thereto. Another "did not mean to be unkind," but
... The rest were silent. For the special benefit of these the writer printed
the original data with numerous details, enabling them in the easiest manner to
verify every statement made by him, if they wished. And to the best of his
ability he has for years seen to it that no scholar whom
surely these things specially concern remain in ignorance of the facts
here recounted and of like cogency.
A notable exception to the above is a lawyer of standing [now also
dead], whose books on Law are deemed as of authority. He had intelligence
enough and candor withal to confess that the case for the Bible as made out by
the writer is impregnable, that the Bible is thus proved to be an "absolutely
unique book." This much the case itself exhorts from the but too well equipped writer on - EVIDENCE; and
accordingly he henceforth reads the writer's Numerics with intense
appreciation. And then, fresh from this confession, he betakes himself once
more to the circulation of his anti-Christian books in the writing of which he
joys to spend his leisure hours.
In the second letter to the N. Y. Sun the author, in discussing some
irrelevant "answers" to his first letter, recited the three
ways of refuting him and then continued:
No sane man will try to refute me by the second method. To refute me
by the first method I herewith respectfully invite any or all of the following
to prove that my facts are not facts: namely Messrs: Lyman Abbott, Washington
Gladden, Heber Newton, Minot J. Savage, Presidents Eliot of Harvard, White of
Cornell, Professors J. Henry Thayer of Harvard, and Dr. Briggs, and any other
prominent higher critic so called. They may associate with themselves, if they choose, all the contributors of the ninth edition of the
Encyclopedia Britannica who wrote its articles on Biblical subjects together
with a dozen mathematicians of the calibre of Professor Simon Newcomb. The
heavier the calibre of either scholar or
mathematician, the more satisfactory to me.
They will find that my facts are facts. And since they are facts, I
am ready to take them to any three prominent lawyers, or, better still, to any
judge of a superior or supreme court, and abide by his decision as to whether
the conclusion is not necessary that Inspiration alone can account for the
facts, if they are facts.
All I should ask would be that the judge treat
the case as he would any other case that comes before him: declining to admit
matters for discussion as irrelevant when they are irrelevant; and listening
patiently to both sides, as he does in any trial. panin.htm
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/