Difference between revisions of "Mk 9:25"
(Created page with "'''Back to Treasury of Scripture Knowledge''' ---- '''Back to Mark'''' ---- he rebuked. Mark 1:25-27; Mark 5:7; Mark 5:8; Zech 3:2; Matt 17:18; Luke 4:35; Luke 4:41; Lu...") |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 00:36, 20 March 2012
Back to Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Back to Mark'
he rebuked.
Mark 1:25-27; Mark 5:7; Mark 5:8; Zech 3:2; Matt 17:18; Luke 4:35; Luke 4:41; Luke 9:42; Jude 1:9
thou.
If this had been only a natural disease, as some have contended, could our Lord with any propriety have thus addressed it?
If the demoniacal possession had been false, or merely a vulgar error, would our Lord, the Revealer of truth, have thus established falsehood, sanctioned error, or encouraged deception, by teaching men to ascribe effects to the malice and power of evil spirits, which they had no agency in producing? Impossible! Such conduct is utterly unworthy the sacred character of the Redeemer.
Isa 35:5; Isa 35:6; Matt 9:32; Matt 9:33; Matt 12:22; Luke 11:14
I charge.
Luke 8:29; Acts 16:18