Difference between revisions of "Judg 19:29"
(Created page with "'''Back to Treasury of Scripture Knowledge''' ---- '''Back to Judges'''' ---- divided her. It is probable, that with the pieces he sent to each tribe a circumstantial a...") |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
It is probable, that with the pieces he sent to each tribe a circumstantial account of the barbarity of the men of Gibeah; and that they considered each of the pieces as expressing an execration. | It is probable, that with the pieces he sent to each tribe a circumstantial account of the barbarity of the men of Gibeah; and that they considered each of the pieces as expressing an execration. | ||
− | That a similar custom prevailed in ancient times is evident from 1 | + | That a similar custom prevailed in ancient times is evident from 1 Sa 11:7. |
It had an inhuman appearance, thus to mangle the corpse of this unhappy woman; but it was intended to excite a keener resentment against so horrible a crime, which called for a punishment proportionally severe. | It had an inhuman appearance, thus to mangle the corpse of this unhappy woman; but it was intended to excite a keener resentment against so horrible a crime, which called for a punishment proportionally severe. |
Latest revision as of 20:40, 28 January 2012
Back to Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Back to Judges'
divided her.
It is probable, that with the pieces he sent to each tribe a circumstantial account of the barbarity of the men of Gibeah; and that they considered each of the pieces as expressing an execration.
That a similar custom prevailed in ancient times is evident from 1 Sa 11:7.
It had an inhuman appearance, thus to mangle the corpse of this unhappy woman; but it was intended to excite a keener resentment against so horrible a crime, which called for a punishment proportionally severe.
Judg 20:6; Judg 20:7; Rom 10:2
with her bones.
Deut 21:22; Deut 21:23