Difference between revisions of "Gen. 36:16"
(Created page with "'''Back to Treasury of Scripture Knowledge''' ---- '''Back to Genesis'''' ---- Duke Korah.As it is certain from ver. 4, that Eliphaz was Esau's son by Adah, and from ver....") |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''Back to [[Genesis']]''' | '''Back to [[Genesis']]''' | ||
---- | ---- | ||
| − | Duke Korah.As it is certain from | + | Duke Korah. |
| − | "Teman, Omar, Zepho, Gatam, Kenaz, and Amalek;" as is is also certain, from | + | |
| + | As it is certain from Gen 36:4, that Eliphaz was Esau's son by Adah, and from Gen 36:11, 12, that Eliphaz had but six sons, | ||
| + | "Teman, Omar, Zepho, Gatam, Kenaz, and Amalek;" as is is also certain, from Gen 36:5, 14, that Korah was the son of Esau (not Eliphaz) | ||
| + | |||
by Aholibamah; and as the words duke Korah are omitted by both the Samaritan Text and Version, Dr. Kennicott pronounces them to be | by Aholibamah; and as the words duke Korah are omitted by both the Samaritan Text and Version, Dr. Kennicott pronounces them to be | ||
an interpolation. | an interpolation. | ||
Latest revision as of 20:51, 11 January 2012
Back to Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Back to Genesis'
Duke Korah.
As it is certain from Gen 36:4, that Eliphaz was Esau's son by Adah, and from Gen 36:11, 12, that Eliphaz had but six sons, "Teman, Omar, Zepho, Gatam, Kenaz, and Amalek;" as is is also certain, from Gen 36:5, 14, that Korah was the son of Esau (not Eliphaz)
by Aholibamah; and as the words duke Korah are omitted by both the Samaritan Text and Version, Dr. Kennicott pronounces them to be an interpolation.
dukes.
Ex 15:15