What is Christianity Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Difference between revisions of "JY 5"

Line 1: Line 1:
'''Back to [[A Devotional Commentary on the Gospels]]'''
+
'''January 5'''<br><br>
----
+
====Luke 1:1-4 The Preface to Luke.====
 
+
<p> The holy Evangelist Luke writes a short  preface before his history of the Lord Jesus Christ.<br><br>
<p>'''January 5'''<br><br>
+
This preface is a kind of letter to  Theophilus, for whose use especially he wrote the history. Let us inquire who Luke was, and who Theophilus was. Luke is not mentioned in any of the Gospels; but Paul speaks of him in his epistle to the Colossians,  as, &quot;the beloved physician,&quot; Col 4:14. There is reason also to suppose he  was not a Jew, but a converted heathen; yet he had the honour of writing a part  of the holy Word of God. Theophilus was probably a governor; therefore he was  called &quot;most excellent,&quot; as dukes are now styled &quot;your  grace,&quot; and kings &quot;your majesty.&quot; Theophilus, though a nobleman,  had been instructed in religion by some of God's servants; but Luke wished him to know the history of the Lord still  more perfectly. He says in the fourth verse, that he had written this account  that &quot;you (Theophilus) might know the certainty of those things wherein  you have been instructed.&quot;<br><br>
Luke 1:1-4 &nbsp;<strong><em>The Preface to Luke.</em></strong> <br><br>
+
  The holy Evangelist Luke writes a short  preface before his history of the Lord Jesus Christ.<br><br>
+
  This preface is a kind of letter to  Theophilus, for whose use especially he wrote the history. Let us inquire who Luke was, and who Theophilus was. Luke is not mentioned in any of the Gospels; but Paul speaks of him in his epistle to the Colossians,  as, &quot;the beloved physician,&quot; Col 4:14. There is reason also to suppose he  was not a Jew, but a converted heathen; yet he had the honour of writing a part  of the holy Word of God. Theophilus was probably a governor; therefore he was  called &quot;most excellent,&quot; as dukes are now styled &quot;your  grace,&quot; and kings &quot;your majesty.&quot; Theophilus, though a nobleman,  had been instructed in religion by some of God's servants; but Luke wished him to know the history of the Lord still  more perfectly. He says in the fourth verse, that he had written this account  that &quot;you (Theophilus) might know the certainty of those things wherein  you have been instructed.&quot;<br><br>
+
 
   It appears that other people had  written histories of Christ. These people had not  been directed by the Holy Spirit, as the Evangelists had; neither had they  themselves witnessed the events they had related. They had written from  &quot;report,&quot; and their accounts contained errors. It is happy for us  that these erroneous accounts have not been handed down to us, but only the  inspired histories of the four Evangelists.<br><br>
 
   It appears that other people had  written histories of Christ. These people had not  been directed by the Holy Spirit, as the Evangelists had; neither had they  themselves witnessed the events they had related. They had written from  &quot;report,&quot; and their accounts contained errors. It is happy for us  that these erroneous accounts have not been handed down to us, but only the  inspired histories of the four Evangelists.<br><br>
 
   Luke himself had not been an eye-witness of the events  he records; yet we cannot say he wrote from &quot;report,&quot; for he was  directed by the Spirit of God. He had enjoyed great opportunities of knowing  about Jesus—he declares in Luke 1:3, that  he had had perfect understanding of all things from the &quot;very first,&quot;  or from the very earliest part of our Saviour's life. Still his history would  not have been reckoned a part of the holy Bible, if the Holy Spirit had not  directed him what to write. This book has always been read in the assemblies of  Christians, and called the word of God.<br><br>
 
   Luke himself had not been an eye-witness of the events  he records; yet we cannot say he wrote from &quot;report,&quot; for he was  directed by the Spirit of God. He had enjoyed great opportunities of knowing  about Jesus—he declares in Luke 1:3, that  he had had perfect understanding of all things from the &quot;very first,&quot;  or from the very earliest part of our Saviour's life. Still his history would  not have been reckoned a part of the holy Bible, if the Holy Spirit had not  directed him what to write. This book has always been read in the assemblies of  Christians, and called the word of God.<br><br>
 
   Let us thank God for this part of his  word. How many interesting events and parables are related by Luke, which we would never have known, had he not  written!&nbsp;<em>How we ought to value everything that concerns the Lord Jesus!</em>&nbsp;When  we love a friend, we desire to know everything about him, and to hear what he  did even when he was a child! When we have lost him, we think over his dying  words, and lay them up in our hearts! How much more should we delight in  knowing all that concerns the best of friends! When we consider who he was—the  Lord of Glory, we can compare no earthly friend to him; all which relates to  him is wonderful.<br><br>
 
   Let us thank God for this part of his  word. How many interesting events and parables are related by Luke, which we would never have known, had he not  written!&nbsp;<em>How we ought to value everything that concerns the Lord Jesus!</em>&nbsp;When  we love a friend, we desire to know everything about him, and to hear what he  did even when he was a child! When we have lost him, we think over his dying  words, and lay them up in our hearts! How much more should we delight in  knowing all that concerns the best of friends! When we consider who he was—the  Lord of Glory, we can compare no earthly friend to him; all which relates to  him is wonderful.<br><br>
 
   It is affecting to hear how the poor  heathen, when first converted, value the word of God! Before the missionaries  in the South Sea Islands could print the Bible  in the language of the people, the poor natives eagerly listened to all that  was read aloud on the Sabbath, and many wrote down upon the leaves of trees the  texts they had heard, and studied them wherever they went until they knew them  by heart. We are without excuse if we remain ignorant of the history of our  Lord. Let us not, however, forget for what purpose we read—that we may learn to  love Jesus. We are apt to become fond  of human creatures whom we know intimately. How much more might it be expected  that hearing of Jesus would make us  love him; for he is far more excellent than any creature, and far more full of  love to us than our dearest friend.&nbsp;'''<strong>Yet  our hearts are naturally so much hardened against God, that unless the Holy  Spirit soften them, we shall not love him.'''</strong>&nbsp;May  that Spirit be with us, while we read day after day the history of our blessed  Lord.</p>
 
   It is affecting to hear how the poor  heathen, when first converted, value the word of God! Before the missionaries  in the South Sea Islands could print the Bible  in the language of the people, the poor natives eagerly listened to all that  was read aloud on the Sabbath, and many wrote down upon the leaves of trees the  texts they had heard, and studied them wherever they went until they knew them  by heart. We are without excuse if we remain ignorant of the history of our  Lord. Let us not, however, forget for what purpose we read—that we may learn to  love Jesus. We are apt to become fond  of human creatures whom we know intimately. How much more might it be expected  that hearing of Jesus would make us  love him; for he is far more excellent than any creature, and far more full of  love to us than our dearest friend.&nbsp;'''<strong>Yet  our hearts are naturally so much hardened against God, that unless the Holy  Spirit soften them, we shall not love him.'''</strong>&nbsp;May  that Spirit be with us, while we read day after day the history of our blessed  Lord.</p>
 +
 +
'''Back to [[A Devotional Commentary on the Gospels]]'''

Revision as of 00:36, 24 January 2019

January 5

Luke 1:1-4 The Preface to Luke.

The holy Evangelist Luke writes a short preface before his history of the Lord Jesus Christ.

This preface is a kind of letter to Theophilus, for whose use especially he wrote the history. Let us inquire who Luke was, and who Theophilus was. Luke is not mentioned in any of the Gospels; but Paul speaks of him in his epistle to the Colossians, as, "the beloved physician," Col 4:14. There is reason also to suppose he was not a Jew, but a converted heathen; yet he had the honour of writing a part of the holy Word of God. Theophilus was probably a governor; therefore he was called "most excellent," as dukes are now styled "your grace," and kings "your majesty." Theophilus, though a nobleman, had been instructed in religion by some of God's servants; but Luke wished him to know the history of the Lord still more perfectly. He says in the fourth verse, that he had written this account that "you (Theophilus) might know the certainty of those things wherein you have been instructed."

It appears that other people had written histories of Christ. These people had not been directed by the Holy Spirit, as the Evangelists had; neither had they themselves witnessed the events they had related. They had written from "report," and their accounts contained errors. It is happy for us that these erroneous accounts have not been handed down to us, but only the inspired histories of the four Evangelists.

Luke himself had not been an eye-witness of the events he records; yet we cannot say he wrote from "report," for he was directed by the Spirit of God. He had enjoyed great opportunities of knowing about Jesus—he declares in Luke 1:3, that he had had perfect understanding of all things from the "very first," or from the very earliest part of our Saviour's life. Still his history would not have been reckoned a part of the holy Bible, if the Holy Spirit had not directed him what to write. This book has always been read in the assemblies of Christians, and called the word of God.

Let us thank God for this part of his word. How many interesting events and parables are related by Luke, which we would never have known, had he not written! How we ought to value everything that concerns the Lord Jesus! When we love a friend, we desire to know everything about him, and to hear what he did even when he was a child! When we have lost him, we think over his dying words, and lay them up in our hearts! How much more should we delight in knowing all that concerns the best of friends! When we consider who he was—the Lord of Glory, we can compare no earthly friend to him; all which relates to him is wonderful.

It is affecting to hear how the poor heathen, when first converted, value the word of God! Before the missionaries in the South Sea Islands could print the Bible in the language of the people, the poor natives eagerly listened to all that was read aloud on the Sabbath, and many wrote down upon the leaves of trees the texts they had heard, and studied them wherever they went until they knew them by heart. We are without excuse if we remain ignorant of the history of our Lord. Let us not, however, forget for what purpose we read—that we may learn to love Jesus. We are apt to become fond of human creatures whom we know intimately. How much more might it be expected that hearing of Jesus would make us love him; for he is far more excellent than any creature, and far more full of love to us than our dearest friend. Yet our hearts are naturally so much hardened against God, that unless the Holy Spirit soften them, we shall not love him. May that Spirit be with us, while we read day after day the history of our blessed Lord.

Back to A Devotional Commentary on the Gospels