View source for Signs of the Times.

'''Back to [[Arthur Pink]]'''
----
'''Next Part [[Signs of the Times. 2]]'''
----
<p>Let us assure the spiritual reader at the outset, that we are not going to waste his time nor our space, by a consideration of the latest political doings. "Let the potsherd strive with the potsherds of the earth" (Isaiah 45:9)—the child of God has nothing to do with <em>their </em>activities. It is something far more solemn than anything occurring in the <em>political </em>realm that we are now going to write upon, namely—<em>the soul-deceiving character</em>of most of the "Evangelism" of this degenerate and apostate generation.<br><br>
It is generally recognized that <em>spirituality </em>is at a low ebb in Christendom, and not a few perceive that <em>sound doctrine </em>is rapidly on the wane—yet many of the Lord's people take comfort from supposing that the Gospel is still being widely preached and that large numbers are being saved thereby. Alas, their optimistic supposition is ill-founded and grounded in sand. If the "message" now being delivered in Mission Halls be examined, if the "tracts" which are scattered among the unchurched masses be scrutinized, if the "open air" speakers be carefully listened to, if the "sermons" or "addresses" of a "Soul-winning campaign" be analyzed; in short, if modern "Evangelism" be weighed in the balances of Holy Writ—it will be found lacking—<em>lacking </em>that which is vital to a genuine conversion, <em>lacking </em>what is essential if sinners are to be shown their need of a Savior, <em>lacking </em>that which will produce the transfigured lives of new creatures in Christ Jesus.<br><br>
It is in no faultfinding spirit that we write, seeking to make a man an offender for a word. It is not that we are looking for perfection, and complain because we cannot find it; nor that we criticize others because they are not doing things as <em>we </em>think they should be done.<br><br>
No! It is a matter far more serious than that. The "evangelism" of the day is not only superficial to the last degree—but it is <em>radically defective!</em> It is utterly lacking a foundation on which to base an appeal for sinners to come to Christ. There is not only a lamentable lack of proportion (the mercy of God being made far more prominent than His holiness, His love than His wrath)—but there is <em>a fatal omission </em>of that which God has given for the purpose of imparting a knowledge of sin. There is not only reprehensible introducing of "bright singing," humorous witticisms and entertaining anecdotes—but there is a <em>studied omission of the dark background </em>upon which alone the Gospel can effectually shine forth.<br><br>
But serious indeed as is the above indictment, it is only half of it—the negative side, that which is <em>lacking. </em>Worse still, is that which is being retailed by the cheap-jack evangelists of the day. The <em>positive content </em>of their message is nothing but a throwing of dust in the eyes of the sinner. His soul is put to sleep by the Devil's opiate, ministered in a most unsuspecting form. Those who really receive the "message" which is now being given out from most of the "orthodox" pulpits and platforms today are being fatally deceived.<br><br>
It is a way which seems right unto a man—but unless God sovereignly intervenes by a miracle of grace, all who follow it will surely find that the ends thereof are the ways of death. Ten of thousands who confidently imagine they are bound for Heaven—will get a terrible disillusionment when they awake in Hell!<br><br>
<em>What is the Gospel</em>? Is it a message of glad tidings from Heaven to make God-defying rebels at ease in their wickedness? Is it given for the purpose of assuring the pleasure crazy young people that, providing they only "believe" there is nothing for them to fear in the future? One would certainly think so from the way in which the Gospel is presented —or rather perverted—by most of the "evangelists," and the more so when we look at <em>the lives </em>of their "converts." Surely those with any degree of spiritual discernment must perceive that to assure such that God loves them and His Son died for them, and that a full pardon for all their sins (past, present, and future) can be obtained by simply "accepting Christ as their personal Savior," is but a casting of pearls before swine!<br><br>
<em>The Gospel is not a thing apart</em>. It is not something independent of the prior revelation of God's Law. It is not an announcement that God has relaxed His justice or lowered the standard of His holiness. So far from that, when <em>Scripturally expounded, </em>the Gospel presents the clearest demonstration and the most positive proof of the inexorableness of God's justice and of His infinite abhorrence of sin. But for Scripturally expounding the Gospel, beardless youths and businessmen who devote their spare time to "evangelistic effort," are <em>quite unqualified. </em>Alas! that the pride of the flesh allows so many incompetent ones to rush in where those much wiser fear to tread. It is this multiplying of novices that is largely responsible for the woeful situation now confronting us, and because the "churches" and "assemblies" are so largely filled with <em>their </em>"converts," explains why they are so unspiritual and worldly.<br><br>
No, my reader, the Gospel is very, very far from making light of sin. It reveals to us the terrible sword of His justice smiting His beloved Son, in order that atonement might be made for the transgressions of His people. So far from the Gospel setting aside the Law, it exhibits the Savior enduring the curse of it. Calvary supplied the most solemn and awe-inspiring display of <em>God's hatred of sin </em>that time or eternity will ever furnish!<br><br>
And do you imagine that the Gospel is magnified or God glorified, by going to worldlings and telling them that they "may be saved at this moment by simply accepting Christ as their personal Savior" <em>while they are </em>wedded to their idols and their hearts still in love with sin? If I do so, I tell them <em>a lie</em>, pervert the Gospel, insult Christ, and turn the grace of God into a license for immorality.<br><br>
No doubt some readers are ready to object to our "harsh" and "sarcastic" statements above by asking, When the question was put "What must I do to be saved?" did not an inspired Apostle expressly say "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ—and you shall be saved?" Can we err, then, if <em>we </em>tell sinners the same thing today? Have we not Divine warrant for so doing? True, those words are found in Holy Writ, and because they <em>are</em>, many superficial and untrained people conclude they are justified in repeating them to all people. But let it be pointed out that Acts 16:31 was not addressed to a promiscuous multitude—but <em>to a particular individual</em>, which at once intimates that it is <em>not </em>a message to be indiscriminately sounded forth—but rather a special word, to those <em>whose characters correspond </em>to the one to whom it was first spoken.<br><br>
Verses of Scripture must not be wrenched from their setting—but weighed, interpreted, and applied <em>in accord with their context</em>; and <em>that </em>calls for prayerful consideration, careful meditation, and prolonged study; and it is failure at <em>this </em>point which accounts for these shoddy and worthless "messages" of this rush-ahead age. Look at the context of Acts 16:31, and what do we find? What was the occasion, and <em>to whom </em>was it that the Apostle and his companion said "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ"? A sevenfold answer is there furnished, which supplies a striking and complete delineation of the character of those to whom we are warranted in giving this truly evangelistic word. As we briefly names these seven details, let the reader carefully <em>ponder </em>them.<br><br>
First, the man to whom those words were spoken had just witnessed <em>the miracle working power of God. </em>"And suddenly there was a great earthquake, so that the foundations of the prison were shaken—and immediately all the doors were opened, and everyone's chains were loosed" (Acts 16:26).<br><br>
Second, in consequence thereof, the man was deeply stirred, even to the point of self-despair, "He drew out his sword, and would have killed himself, supposing that the prisoners had been fled" (Acts 16:27).<br><br>
Third, he felt <em>the need of illumination</em>, "Then he called for a light" (Acts 16:29).<br><br>
Fourth, his <em>self-delight was utterly shattered</em>, for he "came trembling" (Acts 16:29).<br><br>
Fifth, he took his proper place before God—<em>in the dust</em>, for he "fell down before Paul and Silas" (Acts 16:29).<br><br>
Sixth, he showed respect and <em>consideration for God's servants</em>, for he "brought them out" (Acts 16:30).<br><br>
Seventh, then, with <em>a deep concern for his soul</em>, he asked "what must I do to be saved?"<br><br>
Here, then, is something definite for our guidance—if we are willing to be guided. It was no giddy, careless, unconcerned person, who was exhorted to "simply" believe; but instead, one who gave clear evidence that a mighty work of God had already been wrought within him. He was <em>an awakened soul </em>(Acts 16:27). In <em>his </em>case there was no need to press upon him his lost condition, for obviously he felt it; nor were the apostles required to urge upon him the duty of repentance, for his entire demeanor betokened his contrition.
----
'''Next Part [[Signs of the Times. 2]]'''
----
'''Back to [[Arthur Pink]]'''